From 649c3f8f8a4f68f8b6fc83481272d3f626bde3a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marcel Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 19:09:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs(audit): narrow J10 coverage claim to what the bell test actually exercises Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 --- docs/audits/e2e-coverage-report.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/audits/e2e-coverage-report.md b/docs/audits/e2e-coverage-report.md index 0ffa8886..fa5a9a5d 100644 --- a/docs/audits/e2e-coverage-report.md +++ b/docs/audits/e2e-coverage-report.md @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ **Pre-existing coverage:** Deep-link scroll in `notification-deep-link.spec.ts`. -**Gap filled:** A test seeds a comment, then via the bell button opens the notification dropdown, verifies the unread count badge, clicks a notification to mark it as read, and confirms the badge disappears. +**Gap filled:** A test in `notification-deep-link.spec.ts` seeds a comment, clicks the notification bell button, and asserts the dropdown/dialog opens; pressing Escape closes it. The full mark-as-read flow and navigation to the target document are **not** covered by this test — tracked in a follow-up issue. ---