# Persona Review Results — Profile picture upload > Captured from the six persona spec reviews (the comments that, in a real feature, are > posted on the Gitea issue). This is the worked example of what a completed review round > looks like. All personas APPROVE; the two findings raised were folded into the spec > before approval. ## Summary | Persona | Verdict | Blocking FAILs | Notes | |---|---|---|---| | Requirements Engineer | APPROVE | none | — | | Developer | APPROVE | none | — | | Security | APPROVE | none (2 resolved) | See F-SEC-1, F-SEC-2 | | DevOps | APPROVE | none | — | | UI/UX | APPROVE | none (1 resolved) | See F-UX-1 | | Architect | APPROVE | none (1 resolved) | See F-ARCH-1 | --- ## ### Security — Spec Review | # | Item | Status | Note | |---|---|---|---| | 1 | All mutating endpoints have authn + authz `If` clauses | PASS | REQ-006 (401), REQ-009 (403) | | 2 | Each mutating endpoint names least-privilege `Permission` | PASS | `me` = authenticated; `{id}` = ADMIN_USER | | 3 | Audit fields server-set, forbidden in body | PASS | `avatarObjectKey` server-set (design.md) | | 4 | IDOR surfaces addressed | PASS | `/{id}` gated by ADMIN_USER + ownership | | 5 | Untrusted content rendered safely | PASS | image bytes via proxy + `nosniff` | | 6 | Upload: type allow-list + size + bytes | PASS | REQ-007 (PNG/JPEG), REQ-008 (2 MB) | | 7 | No entity internals leaked | PASS | `UserProfileView`, not `AppUser` | | 8 | Conflicts → 409 not raw 500 | N/A | no optimistic-lock surface here | | 9 | threat-model.md present & STRIDE-complete | PASS | [threat-model.md](./threat-model.md) | | 10 | ASTRIDE if AI tool used | N/A | no AI agent | | 11 | Secrets from env only | PASS | none introduced | | 12 | Logs PII-free | PASS | user UUID only | | 13 | New dependency has ADR + clean audit | N/A | no new dependency | **F-SEC-1 (resolved):** initial draft exposed a public S3 URL for `avatarUrl` → information disclosure. Resolved: authenticated proxy `GET /api/users/{id}/avatar`. **F-SEC-2 (resolved):** initial draft bound `avatarObjectKey` from the request body → mass-assignment. Resolved: server-set only. **Verdict: APPROVE.** ## ### UI/UX — Spec Review | # | Item | Status | Note | |---|---|---|---| | 1 | Every interaction state described | PASS | idle/preview/uploading/error/done (T-10) | | 2 | Strings via Paraglide i18n | PASS | T-8 | | 3 | Reuses design tokens/components | PASS | placeholder uses existing initials pattern | | 4 | Responsive per device split | PASS | control usable on phone + laptop | | 5 | Errors via `getErrorMessage(code)` | PASS | UNSUPPORTED_FILE_TYPE / AVATAR_TOO_LARGE | | 6 | Keyboard + screen-reader | PASS | labelled file input, alt text on image | | 7 | Acceptance criteria measurable | PASS | sizes, status codes | | 8 | E2E scenario per journey | PASS | T-12 | | 9 | Confirmation for destructive action | PASS | remove asks to confirm | | 10 | Safe rendering + image dims | PASS | fixed dims avoid layout shift | | 11 | Live routes verified | PASS | `/profile`, `/users/[id]` exist | | 12 | Token theming respected | PASS | semantic tokens | **F-UX-1 (resolved):** no loading state in first draft → spinner during upload added (REQ-... covered by state set in T-10). **Verdict: APPROVE.** ## ### Architect — Spec Review Key items PASS. **F-ARCH-1 (resolved):** bucket choice was undocumented → captured in [adr-001-avatars-reuse-archive-bucket.md](./adr-001-avatars-reuse-archive-bucket.md). No new domain, no boundary crossing, Person/AppUser separation intact. **Verdict: APPROVE.** ## ### Requirements Engineer / Developer / DevOps — Spec Review All checklist items PASS (see each persona's checklist in `.specify/personas/`). RE: 9 REQ ids, all EARS-formed, every limit has an `If`. Developer: reuses `FileService`/`UserService`, `AVATAR_TOO_LARGE` four-site update is T-1. DevOps: V78 forward-only + rollback note, no new bucket/env var, idempotent overwrite. **All three: APPROVE.**