1803db86b5
Some checks failed
CI / Unit & Component Tests (pull_request) Failing after 3m1s
CI / OCR Service Tests (pull_request) Successful in 30s
CI / Backend Unit Tests (pull_request) Failing after 3m0s
CI / Unit & Component Tests (push) Failing after 2m59s
CI / OCR Service Tests (push) Successful in 37s
CI / Backend Unit Tests (push) Failing after 2m54s
- DocumentServiceTest.applyBulkEditToDocument_propagatesDomainException_whenSenderIdUnresolvable (Sara C1) - DocumentServiceTest.findIdsForFilter_passesTagOperatorOR_throughBuildSearchSpec (Sara C3) - bulkSelection.svelte.spec.ts: setAll([]) no-op + previous-IDs-absent + ids getter (Sara C4 + S4) - /documents/bulk-edit/+page.server.ts now defensively handles a UserGroup with NULL `permissions` (treats it as not-WRITE_ALL instead of throwing on .includes()) + matching test (Sara C7) 233 backend tests + frontend bulk-edit specs all green. Refs #225, PR #331 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
13 lines
479 B
TypeScript
13 lines
479 B
TypeScript
import { redirect } from '@sveltejs/kit';
|
|
|
|
export async function load({ locals }: { locals: App.Locals }) {
|
|
// Defensive: a UserGroup row with NULL permissions returns undefined here
|
|
// rather than throwing on .includes() — treat that as "not WRITE_ALL".
|
|
const canWrite =
|
|
locals.user?.groups?.some(
|
|
(g: { permissions?: string[] }) => g.permissions?.includes('WRITE_ALL') ?? false
|
|
) ?? false;
|
|
if (!canWrite) throw redirect(303, '/documents');
|
|
return { canWrite };
|
|
}
|