marcel
8558567688
All checks were successful
CI / Unit & Component Tests (push) Successful in 5m10s
CI / OCR Service Tests (push) Successful in 24s
CI / Backend Unit Tests (push) Successful in 5m14s
CI / fail2ban Regex (push) Successful in 50s
CI / Semgrep Security Scan (push) Successful in 27s
CI / Compose Bucket Idempotency (push) Successful in 1m5s
Closes #837 Makes `PersonRelationship` fully editable (type, related person, dates, notes), migrates its dates from `Integer fromYear/toYear` to `LocalDate + DatePrecision` (mirroring the #773 person pattern, ADR-039 / V76), activates the previously-dead `notes` column, and gives the Zeitstrahl's derived **Heirat** events full date precision for free. Both Open Decisions confirmed as adopted: **no `@Version`** (last-write-wins, single-writer archive) and **`DELETE` ownership-mismatch aligned 403 → 404** (anti-enumeration, matching the new `PUT`). ## What's in it - **V78** migrates `person_relationships.from_year/to_year` → `from_date`/`to_date` + NOT-NULL `*_date_precision` (default `UNKNOWN`); pre-check abort on corrupt years, `YYYY-01-01`/`YEAR` backfill, 5 named CHECK constraints, year columns dropped. - **`PUT /api/persons/{id}/relationships/{relId}`** (`@RequirePermission(WRITE_ALL)`) re-runs every create invariant (self / coherence / order / reverse-PARENT_OF / duplicate) and re-flags family membership; orientation preserved per viewpoint. - New `ErrorCode.INVALID_RELATIONSHIP_DATES` registered in all four sites (§3.6). - `TimelineEventService` sources the derived marriage date from `SPOUSE_OF.fromDate` + precision. - Frontend: `RelationshipDateField` (DAY/MONTH/YEAR), upsert-capable `AddRelationshipForm` (pre-fill + notes + in-flight submit lock), `RelationshipChip` Edit affordance, `updateRelationship` server action, read-view date range + notes, `formatRelationshipDateRange` helper. `api.ts` regenerated. - Docs: ADR-044, db-orm/db-relationships diagrams, DEPLOYMENT §5 deploy note, RTM REQ-001…REQ-019. ## Requirements All 19 EARS requirements implemented red/green and marked `Done` in `.specify/rtm.md`. ## Test plan - **Backend** (targeted, green): `RelationshipMigrationTest` (Testcontainers pg16, 8), `RelationshipServiceTest` (22), `RelationshipControllerTest` (15), `RelationshipServiceIntegrationTest` (real DB, 10), `DerivedEventsAssemblyTest` (17), `ArchitectureTest` (14); `clean package` builds. - **Frontend** (green): `relationshipDates.spec.ts`, `AddRelationshipForm.svelte.spec.ts`, `RelationshipChip.svelte.spec.ts`, `PersonRelationshipsCard.svelte.test.ts`, `page.server.spec.ts`, `messages.spec.ts`. `npm run check` = 798 (below the ~834 baseline); `npm run lint` clean. ## Notes for reviewers - **Spec deviation:** the edit form was built by making `AddRelationshipForm` upsert-capable rather than a duplicate `EditRelationshipForm` (DRY); RTM rows reference `AddRelationshipForm.svelte.spec.ts`. - `api.ts` regenerated from the live spec; only relationship-relevant hunks remain (one springdoc `PageableObject` field-reorder pruned). - **Deploy:** V78 is one-way and not rolling-deploy-safe — stop old JAR → start new JAR (Flyway runs first); targeted `pg_restore -t person_relationships` for rollback. No maintenance window. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Marcel <marcel@familienarchiv> Reviewed-on: #841
docs/
Project documentation organised into four categories: architecture decision records (ADRs), system architecture diagrams, infrastructure runbooks, and detailed UI/UX specifications.
Folder structure
docs/
├── adr/ # Architecture Decision Records
├── architecture/ # C4 model diagrams and system architecture docs
├── infrastructure/ # Deployment, CI/CD, and ops guides
├── specs/ # UI/UX feature specifications (HTML)
├── ARCHITECTURE.md # Human-readable architecture overview (DOC-2)
├── DEPLOYMENT.md # Day-1 checklist and operational reference (DOC-5)
├── GLOSSARY.md # Domain terminology (DOC-3)
├── security-guide.md # Security policies and hardening guide
└── STYLEGUIDE.md # Coding and design style guide
ADR (adr/)
Architecture Decision Records capture major technical decisions and their rationale.
| ADR | Title | Status |
|---|---|---|
001-ocr-python-microservice.md |
OCR as a separate Python container | Accepted |
002-polygon-jsonb-storage.md |
Polygon coordinates in JSONB columns | Accepted |
003-chronik-unified-activity-feed.md |
Unified activity feed (Chronik) | Accepted |
When making a significant architectural change (new service, data model change, technology swap), write a new ADR:
- Status (Proposed / Accepted / Deprecated / Superseded)
- Context (forces at play)
- Decision (what we decided)
- Consequences (trade-offs)
- Alternatives Considered (table format)
ADRs are sequential (NNN-descriptive-name.md). Do not reuse numbers.
Architecture (architecture/)
Contains C4 model diagrams describing the system at different zoom levels:
- Context diagram — How Familienarchiv fits into the user and system ecosystem
- Container diagram — The high-level technology choices (Spring Boot, SvelteKit, PostgreSQL, MinIO, OCR service)
- Component diagram — Major structural components within the backend
Written in Markdown with embedded Mermaid diagrams (c4-diagrams.md). Gitea renders these automatically.
For the human-readable architecture narrative, see docs/ARCHITECTURE.md.
Infrastructure (infrastructure/)
Operational documentation for running Familienarchiv in production and CI.
| Document | Purpose |
|---|---|
ci-gitea.md |
Gitea CI/CD pipeline configuration |
production-compose.md |
Production Docker Compose setup and VPS provisioning |
s3-migration.md |
Migrating documents between S3 buckets |
self-hosted-catalogue.md |
Self-hosted software catalogue |
For the day-1 deployment checklist, see docs/DEPLOYMENT.md.
Specs (specs/)
High-fidelity UI/UX specifications written as standalone HTML files. These are design documents describing exact layout, interactions, and responsive behavior before implementation.
Each spec typically includes:
- Visual mockups with CSS-in-HTML styling
- Interaction flows and state transitions
- Responsive breakpoint behavior
- Accessibility requirements
Before implementing a feature, check specs/ for an existing specification.
Style Guide
docs/STYLEGUIDE.md covers:
- Code formatting and linting rules
- Component naming conventions
- Color palette and typography
- Accessibility standards (WCAG 2.1 AA)