Sara Holt — Senior QA Engineer
Verdict: Approved with concerns
47 new tests across the right layers (unit on mention.ts, component on PersonHoverCard and TranscriptionReadView, e2e…
Nora "NullX" Steiner — Application Security Engineer
Verdict: Approved with concerns
The XSS hardening here is unambiguously good. escapeHtml is correct (escapes & < > " ' in the…
Elicit — Senior Requirements Engineer
Verdict: Approved with concerns
I'm in Brownfield mode here, reviewing PR-B2 against issue #362 expectations. This PR-B2 description is dense,…
Tobias Wendt — DevOps & Platform Engineer
Verdict: Approved
Frontend-only change. No Compose deltas, no CI workflow changes, no image tags, no volumes, no env vars, no secrets. There is…
Felix Brandt — Senior Fullstack Developer
Verdict: Approved with concerns
Read every changed line. TDD evidence is solid — 47 tests with named, sentence-style assertions; `mention.spec.t…
Markus Keller — Senior Application Architect
Verdict: Approved with concerns
This is a well-bounded frontend-only change. The module boundary between the rendering helper (mention.ts),…
PR-B2 (Frontend, read-mode + hover card) opened — #371
http://heim-nas:3005/marcel/familienarchiv/pulls/371
Implements the PR-B2 scope from the consolidated plan in [#362#issuecomment-533…
🏁 Cycle 2 — Final Status
All cycle-1 concerns triaged and addressed. Cycle-2 review verdicts (above):
📋 Requirements Engineer — Cycle 2 Re-Review
Verdict: ✅ Approved
Walking through my cycle-1 asks against the updated PR description:
⚙️ DevOps — Cycle 2 Re-Review
Verdict: ✅ LGTM
Cycle 2's diff is still entirely frontend code — 11 files touched (8 svelte/ts, 3 i18n JSONs). Zero changes to:
Dockerfile/…
🎨 Leonie Werner — Cycle 2 Re-Review
Verdict: ⚠️ Approved with one remaining concern
Six of my seven cycle-1 concerns are addressed cleanly:
🧪 Tester — Cycle 2 Re-Review
Verdict: ✅ Approved
Every concern I raised has a corresponding commit + assertion:
🛡️ Sina Tariq — Cycle 2 Re-Review
Verdict: ✅ Approved
Walking through my cycle-1 concerns: