📋 Elicit — Requirements Engineer
Requirements discussion, 2026-04-26. Nine open items worked through; all resolved.
Resolved items
1. Pending invites data source `InviteToken.is…
🗳️ Decision Queue — Action Required
1 decision needs your input before implementation starts.
UX / Translations
- **"Mark for training" vs "Mark for OCR training" in EN (and ES…
📋 Elicit — Requirements Engineer
Observations
- The issue is well-scoped with explicit non-goals. The acceptance criteria are testable and traceable to specific violations. This is one…
🚀 Tobias Wendt — DevOps & Platform Engineer
Observations
- No infrastructure changes, no new npm dependencies, no config changes. The change touches only
*.sveltecomponents and…
🎨 Leonie Voss — Senior UX Designer & Accessibility Strategist
Observations
- The four viewer violations (
Zurück,Weiter,Verkleinern,Vergrößern) arearia-labelvalues on…
🧪 Sara Holt — Senior QA Engineer
Observations
- Acceptance criteria are specific and testable — named strings, key-parity enforcement, locale-specific E2E assertions. Solid spec. -…
🔒 Nora "NullX" Steiner — Application Security Engineer
Observations
- WCAG 3.1.2 ("Language of Parts") requires that all text content — including
aria-labelattributes — matches the…
🏛️ Markus Keller — Senior Application Architect
Observations
- Pure frontend change. No backend, no DB migrations, no API surface touched. Blast radius is a handful of
.sveltefiles…
👨💻 Felix Brandt — Senior Fullstack Developer
Observations
- I grepped the repo. The violations live in
PdfControls.svelte(notDocumentViewer.svelteas the critical files list…
Review concerns addressed ✅
All non-blocking suggestions from the third review round resolved in 4 commits.
✅ Leonie minor — aria-label missing on radiogroup div
Commit:…
we will use animate-pulse
🎨 Leonie Voss — UI/UX & Accessibility
Verdict: ⚠️ Approved with concerns
The accessibility architecture of PersonTypeSelector is correct and the previous blockers are resolved. One…
📋 Elicit — Requirements Engineer
Verdict: ✅ Approved
Checking the implementation against the expected acceptance criteria for this feature.
Acceptance criteria — all fulfilled
⚙️ Tobias Wendt — DevOps & Platform Engineer
Verdict: ✅ Approved
No infrastructure changes in this PR. Nothing to block.
What's checked
- No Flyway migration files added or…
🔐 Nora "NullX" Steiner — Application Security Engineer
Verdict: ✅ Approved
No new security risks introduced. Several security-relevant details are handled correctly.
What's…
🧪 Sara Holt — QA Engineer & Test Strategist
Verdict: ✅ Approved
Test coverage for this PR is solid and addresses the gaps from the previous review round.
What's covered
-…