📋 "Elicit" — Requirements Engineer (cycle 4 / convergence check)
Verdict: ✅ Approved — no remaining concerns
Cycle 3 was ✅ for me on all open requirements concerns. Cycle 4's three…
🛠️ Tobias Wendt — DevOps & Platform Engineer (cycle 4 / convergence check)
Verdict: ✅ Approved — no remaining concerns
Cycle 4 touched zero infrastructure surface. ADR-026 §"Operationa…
🎨 Leonie Voss — UX Designer & Accessibility Strategist (cycle 4 / convergence check)
Verdict: ✅ Approved — no remaining concerns
Cycle-3 was ✅ for me. Cycle-4's three commits are all…
🛡️ Nora "NullX" Steiner — Application Security Engineer (cycle 4 / convergence check)
Verdict: ✅ Approved — no remaining concerns
Cycle-3 was ✅ for me. Cycle-4 introduces three…
🧪 Sara Holt — QA Engineer (cycle 4 / convergence check)
Verdict: ✅ Approved — no remaining concerns
Cycle-3 was ✅ for me with one cosmetic. Cycle-4 closes that cosmetic and adds zero…
🏛️ Markus Keller — Application Architect (cycle 4 / convergence check)
Verdict: ✅ Approved — no remaining concerns
Both of my cycle-3 ⚠️ items are now closed in code. The architectura…
👨💻 Felix Brandt — Senior Fullstack Developer (cycle 4 / convergence check)
Verdict: ✅ Approved — no remaining concerns
Three atomic structural commits. None ships behaviour. Each is…
Felix Brandt — cycle-4 follow-up (all cycle-3 concerns resolved)
Three atomic commits land the cycle-3 concerns. Each is test-anchored against the existing suite — no new behaviour, pure…
"Elicit" — Requirements Engineer (cycle 3 / final check)
Verdict: Approved
Both of the two soft follow-ups I left open in cycle-2 are now committed. The artefact discipline on this PR is…
Tobias Wendt — DevOps & Platform Engineer (cycle 3 / final check)
Verdict: Approved
Cycle-2 was ✅ for me and stays ✅. Cycle-3 touched zero infrastructure surface — no Compose changes,…
Leonie Voss — UX Designer & Accessibility Strategist (cycle 3 / final check)
Verdict: Approved
My cycle-2 ⚠️ hinged on a single promise: the axe-core readout had to land in the PR…
Nora "NullX" Steiner — Application Security Engineer (cycle 3 / final check)
Verdict: Approved
Cycle-2 was ✅ for me. Cycle-3 introduces zero new attack surface from a security lens.…
Sara Holt — QA Engineer (cycle 3 / final check)
Verdict: Approved
Both of my cycle-2 ⚠️ follow-ups landed exactly as asked. The two test-tightening concerns I filed are now closed in…
Markus Keller — Application Architect (cycle 3 / final check)
Verdict: Approved with concerns
Cycle-2 was ✅. The four cycle-3 commits touch tests, the capture script, and one ADR — no…
Felix Brandt — Senior Fullstack Developer (cycle 3 / final check)
Verdict: Approved with concerns
Four atomic commits, each preceded by the failing assertion the test would catch —…
Cycle-3 iteration — 4 commits + axe-core readout
Closing the cycle-2 concerns from @Sara, @Leonie, and @Elicit. Per-concern resolution below.
Sara (cycle-2)
- **#5 — AC2…
📋 "Elicit" — Requirements Engineer (cycle 2)
Verdict: ✅ Approved
Of the six concerns I raised in cycle 1, three had a clear fix path and all three landed. The other three were…