Elicit — Requirements Engineer & Business Analyst
Verdict: warning Approved with concerns
Reviewing this as the requirements/acceptance-criteria lens for #666 ("render imprecise/unknown…
Tobias Wendt (@tobiwendt) — DevOps & Platform Engineer
Verdict: white_check_mark Approved
Only one infra-facing change in this PR: a new CI step in .gitea/workflows/ci.yml. I reviewed…
Sara Holt (@saraholt) — QA Engineer & Test Strategist
Verdict: warning Approved with concerns
Test strategy here is genuinely good: the drift-guard fixture is the kind of cross-stack…
Markus Keller (@mkeller) — Application Architect
Verdict: white_check_mark Approved
This is presentation logic done with the right boundaries. No schema change, no migration, no new enum…
Leonie Voss (@leonievoss) — UX & Accessibility Lead
Verdict: warning Approved with concerns
The honest-date direction is exactly right for our dual audience — a 67-year-old researcher…
Nora Steiner (@nullx) — Application Security Engineer
Verdict: white_check_mark Approved
This PR introduces one new untrusted-data sink — meta_date_raw, verbatim spreadsheet text —…
Felix Brandt (@felixbrandt) — Senior Fullstack Developer
Verdict: warning Approved with concerns
Clean, well-factored work. The formatter is decomposed into small intent-revealing…
Elicit — Requirements Engineer & Business Analyst
Verdict: Approved with concerns
I review requirements coverage and traceability, not code. This PR closes #669 (Phase 3 of "Handling the…
Leonie Voss — UI/UX Design Lead
Verdict: Approved
The frontend footprint is small — a follow-up to surface the two new backend states in the admin Import Status Card — and it's handled…
Tobias Wendt — DevOps & Platform Engineer
Verdict: Approved with concerns
Backend-only change, no compose/CI/Dockerfile edits, so my surface is config, the runbook, and operational…