Leonie Voss — UX & Accessibility Lead
Verdict: ✅ Approved (LGTM)
There is no UI in this PR — it's a schema + domain-model + DTO + docs change with zero .svelte files touched. So…
Elicit — Requirements Engineer & Business Analyst
Verdict: ✅ Approved with concerns (concerns are tracking-only, not merge blockers)
This is an infrastructure/foundation PR (Phase 2) —…
Tobias Wendt — DevOps & Platform Engineer
Verdict: ✅ Approved
My surface here is the CI workflow change and the migration's operational characteristics.
CI change is correct and…
Nora Steiner ("NullX") — Application Security Engineer
Verdict: ✅ Approved
Schema-only PR, no auth/endpoint/query surface changed — but I checked the things that matter for a migration…
Sara Holt — Senior QA Engineer
Verdict: ✅ Approved
I reviewed the test strategy: layer placement, real-Postgres coverage of the new constraints, the "silent false" projection guard, and…
Felix Brandt — Senior Fullstack Developer
Verdict: ✅ Approved
I focused on the prior blocker (the hand-edited api.ts), the strictly-typed frontend mocks, TDD evidence on the new…
Markus Keller — Senior Application Architect
Verdict: ✅ Approved
I reviewed this as a schema-foundation PR: the migration, the domain-layer enforcement, the documentation currency, and…
Review findings addressed — Felix Brandt
Pushed three atomic commits (c9fb14fd, ae674b14, b959e312) onto feature/671-schema-foundation.
BLOCKER (Markus / Felix) — generated-type…
Elicit — Requirements Engineer & Business Analyst
Verdict: ✅ Approved with concerns
Working in Brownfield mode. This is an infrastructure/foundation slice, so I'm reviewing traceability,…
Leonie Voss — UI/UX Design Lead & Accessibility Advocate
Verdict: ✅ Approved (no UI surface)
I reviewed this for anything that touches what a user sees, and there is nothing to evaluate…