🎨 Leonie Voss — UI/UX Design Lead & Accessibility Strategist
Verdict: ⚠️ Approved with concerns
The whole UI surface of this PR is one card — the "Häufige Korrespondenten" chip — so…
📋 "Elicit" — Requirements Engineer & Business Analyst
Verdict: ⚠️ Approved with concerns
I assessed this against the issue #716 acceptance criteria (the stated single source of truth)…
🔧 Tobias Lange — DevOps Engineer
Verdict: ✅ Approved (LGTM)
I checked this for infrastructure impact: Compose services, CI workflow, reverse-proxy/Caddy config, secrets, migrations,…
🧪 Sara Holt — Senior QA Engineer
Verdict: ⚠️ Approved with concerns
I care about one thing above all on a removal: the acceptance criteria each have a test that actually executes,…
🛡️ Nora Steiner ("NullX") — Application Security Engineer
Verdict: ✅ Approved
A feature removal is mostly attack-surface reduction, so my job here is to confirm nothing was opened up…
👨💻 Felix Brandt — Senior Fullstack Developer
Verdict: ✅ Approved
This is a clean deletion-heavy PR (5433 lines out, 137 in). I focused on the code that survives — the retargeted…
🏛️ Markus Keller — Senior Application Architect
Verdict: ⚠️ Approved with concerns
I reviewed this as a clean, grep-driven feature removal: does the dead code go away completely, do…
🧪 Sara Holt — QA Engineer & Test Strategist
Verdict: ⚠️ Approved with concerns
The fix is small, correct, and the two tests are genuinely good. They assert user-visible behavior…
🎨 Leonie Voss — UI/UX Design Lead & Accessibility Advocate
Verdict: ✅ Approved
I reviewed this purely through the accessibility lens it claims to fix, and it lands cleanly. The a11y…
👨💻 Felix Brandt — Senior Fullstack Developer
⚠️ Approved with concerns — clean, well-factored dedup with real TDD evidence (the no-factory ban is genuine red→green). The shared-mock…
🎨 Leonie Voss — UX / Accessibility Review
⚠️ Solid a11y assertions, but the "single" case has a tautology gap and the error state deserves a second look.
This PR is overwhelmingly…
🏛️ Markus Keller (@mkeller) — Architect
⚠️ Approved with concerns — the context-provider design is sound and the SSE refcount semantics survive the refactor, but the production…
🔒 Nora "NullX" Steiner — Security
✅ LGTM — no auth/session/redirect regression. This is a clean singleton→factory refactor; the security-relevant code paths are byte-for-byte…
🧪 Sara Holt — QA Engineer & Test Strategist
Verdict: ⚠️ Approved with concerns
The fix is minimal and correct, and the two tests are real-DOM (vitest-browser-svelte), correctly…