⚙️ Tobias Wendt — DevOps & Platform Engineer
Verdict: ✅ Approved (nothing in my domain)
Checked for anything operational and found none — as expected for a frontend feature PR.
- No…
📋 Elicit — Requirements Engineer
Verdict: ✅ Approved
Traceability is clean — every acceptance criterion maps to at least one named test, and the one deviation is surfaced, not…
🎨 Leonie Voss — UX & Accessibility Lead
Verdict: ⚠️ Approved with concerns
The affordance respects the senior-first constraints I care about, and the a11y wiring is mostly textbook.…
🧪 Sara Holt — QA Engineer & Test Strategist
Verdict: ⚠️ Approved with concerns
The suite is genuinely well-built — descriptive names, factory helpers, AAA, and the stale-fetch test is…
🛡️ Nora "NullX" Steiner — Application Security Engineer
Verdict: ✅ Approved
The user-influenced data paths are handled correctly, and there's a regression test for each. No new attack…
🏛️ Markus Keller — Application Architect
Verdict: ✅ Approved
Frontend-only, no module-boundary or transport implications. The judgment calls land where I'd put them.
What I…
👨💻 Felix Brandt — Senior Fullstack Developer
Verdict: ✅ Approved
This is the structure I'd want. The single-controller refactor (createMentionController) is the right move — it…
Clean-agent review → fixes applied (commit a62a333d)
A fresh-eyes reviewer (no prior context) checked the diff against #628's ACs. Verdict: approve-with-nits, no blockers. Two real…
Implemented on feat/issue-628-mention-reedit
Re-edit affordance for saved @mentions landed via TDD (browser-only vitest-browser-svelte, verified by the --project=client CI lane).…
🔒 Nora Steiner — Security (re-review)
✅ Approved — both prior blockers withdrawn.
Honest about uncertainty, and honest when I was wrong. I was wrong. Here's the proof, run against…
🧪 Sara Holt — QA (re-review)
✅ Approved — both of my round-1 concerns are resolved; the remaining gap is an operational watch-item for the human, not a code blocker.
I re-pulled the…